Higher (weak) openings
weak 2♥ and 2♠ openings
In vulnerable good 6-card suit, in green good 5-card, weaker 6-card.
Its strength:
- in NV/NV first and second seat: 2-7 points, top honour in the suit (with 8-9 points
we open 3M with a strong 6-card suitn, and pass with an unsuitable hand and overcall later)
- vulnerable, fiest and second seat: 6-10 points
- 3rd seat: up to Opener
- 4th seat: 9-12, good 6-cards suit, vulnerabilty does not matter
Responses:
- S1: singleton ask with the usual responese, but with a good hand 3M+1 must be bid instead of 3M,
and with good 6-4 or 6-5 4m can be bid too (imporant to have good major becuse goes over 3N)
- 2♥-2N: forcing ♠ bid. On this:
- with support: 3♠: weak, 4♠: strong, 4m: SPL
- without that: 3m: good hand, 3♥: weak
- 3m: can be passed, good suit. Bid on with good hand and support, pass otherwise.
- 3♥ forcing
- 3♠/4m: SPL, slam try with good support
Vs their double:
- redouble: two-suiter escape (except in vulnerable on a direct double, strength here)
- 2♠: to play
- 2N...3M-2: transfer (a) sign-off (b) lead directing with support
- 3M-1: game try in opener's major
- suit between 3M and 4M: lead-directing with support, opener shoud bid 4M
2 NT opening
5-5+ major, less than an opening (in vulnerable not much less). Responses:
- 3♣: game or slam try in a major or sign-off in ♦,
or slam try with ♣.
asks a 3♦ bid, then:
- pass: sign-off in ♦
- 3M: game try
- 3N: slam try with ♣
- 4♣: RKC ♥
- 4♦: RKC ♠
- 4M: slam try (biy your keycards if you accept)
- 4N: RKC ♣
- 3♦: natural, forcing
- 3M: sign-off
- 4♣: transfer your longer (better) suit!
- 4♦: bid yourlonger (better) suit!
- 4M: sign-off
3♣...3♠ openings
These are natural pre-emptive bids regarding vulnerability.
In 1st and 2nd seat vulnerable 3m openins should contain 2 top honours (one of them being the
ace normally)
Responses:
- 3♦♥♠-
4♣: ORKC accepting opener's suit
- 3♣-3♦: ORKC♣
- other suit below game level: natural, forcing for a round (opener's new suit: good hand, support, SPL)
- raise: to play
3 NT opening
4-level pre-empt in a minor suit (typically NOT a solid suit)
Should be used (almost) disciplined because can be penalized in this construction, loose
style minor-suit openings should remain at a level of 3m.
Responses:
- 4-7♣: to be corrected with ♦
- 5-6♦: to be corrected with ♣
- 4♦: singleton ask (3M: this one, 4N: no, 5m: the other minor
- 4M: to play
4♣
and 4♦ openings
These are the strong version of 4 major openings: 8.5-9 playing tricks, about 8-14 HCP,
at most one suit with 2 or more quick losers
Responses:
- relay: asks the uncovered suit
- 4M: to play
- 4M+1: RKC(M)
- above it: Danish ask
4♥ and 4♠ openings
natural pre-empts regarding vulnerability (at most 8 tricks in 1st and 2nd seat), can be weak opening strength
Responses:
- S1: RKC(M)
- above it: Danish ask
- 5M: bid 6M if you have at most 1 trump loser vs a singleton
4NT opening
at elast 6-5 in the minors (best to have 1-1 in the minors), and tells losers exactly which is
5 in favorable vulnerability, 4 in equal, 3 in Vuln/NV. In HCP under a strong 1♣ opening.
Responder bids the end-contract, his 5N asks the longer minor.